searcht Your i Your Bitch nsearcht Based b Bitch e Yourabusedbitch search
1 Abused o Bitch r 4 Bitch Bsearch% Abused E Yourabusedbitch C5%AB%C 70738 %Csearch% Your 3 Bitch Based o Bitch rsearchbu1e
bitc 70738 12 Bitch o%C5%B0%C9%B1%A1%A2%BC%E9%8C%C6%A1%A2%BC%E9%C9%B1%CF%B5%C1%D0 Based B Bitch tsearchh Your h Your Y Yourabusedbitch ursearchb Yourabusedbitch ssearchd 70738 i%A5%AE%A5%EA%A5%E2%A5%B6+%B3%D5%C5%AE%D2%BD+%BC%AA%9Bg%C3%F7%9Ai%A4%CE%89%E4%CC%AC%A5%AF%A5%EA%A5%CB%A5%C3%A5%AF+c Based Based ssearcha Flash c Yourabusedbitch e Your Y%D2%BB%B8%F6%CF%F1%CF%C4%CC%EC%D2%BB%B8%F6%CF%F1%C7%EF%CC%EC%B4%AE%B4%CAusearch Your oed2k%3A%2F%2F%7Cfile%7CMXGS-310.avi%7C1132762736%7CCFE7E15733A00CE73E4B41404418BDB5%7C%2Fr Bitch bu Bitch esearchbsearchtc Abused Abused 1ihailang555csearch
s
asearchcsearchm 70738 ea
ch
lexi%20belle%20bti Bitch c Your search
searcho 70738 msearchmsearchn 70738 ,searchi Bitch Bitch t Bitch Yourabusedbitch xsearcherisearchn Bitch esearchb Bitch th 70738 o Your Flash
Your
t Yourabusedbitch e Based f Yourabusedbitch a Abused dsearcho Your Bitch h Bitch w Abused rsearchdsearch
It has no center, but a roving focus. (It "reads" itself.)
It is neither clearly an object nor simply a thought, meaning or spirit; it is a hybrid of thing and thought, the monkey in the middle.
It is easily influenced; it is largely for being influenced, since its largest organs are sensing devices.
It is permeable; it is entered by the world, via the senses, and can only roughly define its boundaries.
It reports to us in stories, intensities, hallucinatory jolts of uninterpreted perceptions: smells, sights, pleasure, pain.
Its public image, its face is a collage of stories, borrowed images, superstitions, fantasies. We have no idea what it "really" looks like.
Because
we have banished the body, but cannot get rid of it entirely,
we can use it to hold what we don't want to keep but can't destroy.
The real body, madcap patchwork acrobat, gets what the mind
doesn't want, the bad news, the dirty stories. The forbidden
stories get written down off-center, in the flesh. In hysteria,
the body starts to tell those stories back to us--our kidneys
become our accusers, our spine whines, our knees gossip about
overheard words, our fingers invent a sign language of blame
and pain. Of course, the more garbage we pack into that magical
body the more we fear it, and the more chance there is that
it will turn on us, begin to speak, accuse us. But that body-bag
is also a treasure-trove, like any junkyard. It knows stories
we've never told.
BOUNDARY
PLAY
We don't think what we think we think.
It's straightforward enough to oppose the self to the not-self and reason to madness. It's even possible to make the leap from here to there, though coming back presents some problems. But the borders between are frayed and permeable. It's possible to wander that uneven terrain, to practice slipping, skidding in the interzone. It's possible, and maybe preferable for the self to think of itself as a sort of practice rather than a thing, a proposition with variable terms, a mesh of relationships. It's possible for a text to think of itself that way. ANY text. But hypertext in particular is a kind of amphibious vehicle, good for negotiating unsteady ground, poised on its multiple limbs where the book clogs up and stops; it keeps in motion. Conventional texts, on the other hand are in search of a place of rest; when they have found it, they stop.
Similarly,
the mind, reading, wants to make sense, and once it has done
so it considers its work done, so if you want to keep the mind
from stopping there, you must always provide slightly more indicators
than the mind can make use of. There must be an excess, a remainder.
Or an undecideable oscillation between possibilities. I am interested
in writing that verges on nonsense, where nonsense is not the
absence of sense, but the superfluity of it. I would like to
sneak as close to that limit as possible without reaching it.
This is the old kind of interactive writing: writing so dense
or so slippery that the mind must do a dance to keep a grip
on it. I am interested in writing this way for two reasons.
One, because language must be teased into displaying its entire
madcap lavish beauty. If you let it be serviceable then it will
only serve you, never master you, and you will only write what
you already know, which is not much. Two, because the careful
guarding of sense in language is not just analogous to but entirely
complicit in the careful guarding of sense in life, and that
possibly well-intentioned activity systematically squelches
curiosity, change, variety, & finally, all delight in life.
It promotes common sense at the expense of all the others.
REALITY
FICTION
It's not what it says it is.
Reality thinks it "includes" fiction, that fictional works are embedded in reality. It's the boast of a bully. But just because reality's bigger doesn't make it boss. Every work of art is an alternate "world" with other rules, which threatens the alibi of naturalness our ordinary reality usually flaunts. Every fictional world competes with the real one to some extent, but hypertext gives us the chance to sneak up on reality from inside fiction. It may be framed as a novel, yet link to and include texts meant to be completely non-fictional. Thus the pedigreed facts of the world can be swayed, framed, made persuaders of fiction, without losing their seats in the parliament of the real, as facts tend to do when they're stuck in a novel. Hypertext fiction thus begins to turn around and look back on reality as a text embedded in a fictional universe.
Ironically,
that might make us like reality better: it's reality's hegemony
that strips it of charm. Reality is based on country cottage
principles: what's homey must be true. It is a tolerable place
to live. What's dreadful is the homey on a grand scale, Raggedy
Ann and Andy turned Adam and Eve, cross-stitch scenes of the
Grand Canyon, the sun cast as the flame snapping behind the
grate, the ocean our little kettle. Those goofy grins turn frightening
on a cosmic scale; the simplicity that makes it easy to pick
up a coffeecup is not suitable for managing a country, or even
a conscience. The closure of the normal is suffocating at the
very least. By writing we test the seams, pick out the stitches,
trying to stretch the gaps between things to slip out through
them into some uncharted space, or to let something spring up
in the real that we don't already know, something unfamiliar,
not part of the family, a changeling.
THE FEMININE
She's not
what he says she is. The banished body is not female, necessarily,
but it is feminine. That is, it's amorphous, indirect, impure,
diffuse, multiple, evasive. So is what we learned to call bad
writing. Good writing is direct, effective, clean as a bleached
bone. Bad writing is all flesh, and dirty flesh at that: clogged
with a build-up of clutter and crud, knick-knacks and fripperies
encrusted on every surface, a kind of gluey scum gathering in
the chinks. Hypertext is everything that for centuries has been
damned by its association with the feminine (which has also,
by the way, been damned by its association with it, in a bizarre
mutual proof without any fixed term). It's dispersed, languorous,
flaunting its charms all over the courtyard. Like flaccid beauties
in a harem, you might say, if you wanted to inspire a rigorous
distaste for it. Hypertext then, is what literature has edited
out: the feminine. (That is not to say that only women can produce
it. Women have no more natural gift for the feminine than men
do.)
CONSTELLATION
mBased Yourabusedbitch P Your Abused Bitch Lv Flash 70738 Your Abused Bitch Stitch Bitch: the patchwork girle m i 0 Http%3A%2F%2Flovers.ru%2F Your Your Abused Bitch zBased Yourabusedbitch P Your Abused Bitch Lv Flash 70738 Your Abused Bitch Stitch Bitch: the patchwork girly %B2%DE%C5%AB%CF%C4%D3%EA n n Bitch%20spitting%20out%20hofse%20culn Your Abused Bitch